<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 720 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781252</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad held that the AO correctly allowed the assessee&#039;s short-term capital loss (STCL) on sale of shares and PCIT&#039;s revision disallowing that allowance was unsustainable, since PCIT pointed to no infirmity in the assessee&#039;s explanations or computations. However, the Tribunal upheld PCIT&#039;s finding that disallowance under s.14A was understated and should be increased to Rs. 42,82,354. The Tribunal also held the claim of CSR expenditure as a deduction under s.80G was legally tenable, so the assessment was not erroneous on that ground. Overall, PCIT&#039;s revision was partly upheld only on the s.14A issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 720 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781252</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad held that the AO correctly allowed the assessee&#039;s short-term capital loss (STCL) on sale of shares and PCIT&#039;s revision disallowing that allowance was unsustainable, since PCIT pointed to no infirmity in the assessee&#039;s explanations or computations. However, the Tribunal upheld PCIT&#039;s finding that disallowance under s.14A was understated and should be increased to Rs. 42,82,354. The Tribunal also held the claim of CSR expenditure as a deduction under s.80G was legally tenable, so the assessment was not erroneous on that ground. Overall, PCIT&#039;s revision was partly upheld only on the s.14A issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>