<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 725 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781257</link>
    <description>ITAT Jaip-AT held that when an assessee files a revised return which is substituted for the original and the assessed income equals the revised return, penalty under s.271(1)(c) is not leviable where there is no finding of incorrect, erroneous or false particulars. Relying on HC precedents, the Tribunal found the assessing authority accepted the revised declaration and recovered tax, so there was no concealment or inaccurate particulars. Appeal allowed and penalty deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 11:24:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 725 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781257</link>
      <description>ITAT Jaip-AT held that when an assessee files a revised return which is substituted for the original and the assessed income equals the revised return, penalty under s.271(1)(c) is not leviable where there is no finding of incorrect, erroneous or false particulars. Relying on HC precedents, the Tribunal found the assessing authority accepted the revised declaration and recovered tax, so there was no concealment or inaccurate particulars. Appeal allowed and penalty deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>