<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 735 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781267</link>
    <description>ITAT held the addition under s.68 deleting unexplained cash credits where receipts were recorded as sundry debtors/sales and included in profit and loss account. The AO neither questioned the genuineness of sales nor examined debtors&#039; accounts or alleged accommodation entries. As amounts were already offered to tax as regular business income, they could not be taxed again under s.68. The addition was deleted and the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 735 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781267</link>
      <description>ITAT held the addition under s.68 deleting unexplained cash credits where receipts were recorded as sundry debtors/sales and included in profit and loss account. The AO neither questioned the genuineness of sales nor examined debtors&#039; accounts or alleged accommodation entries. As amounts were already offered to tax as regular business income, they could not be taxed again under s.68. The addition was deleted and the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>