<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 754 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781286</link>
    <description>SC condoned the delay and granted leave, allowing appeal on the question whether Section 56(2)(viia) applies to bonus shares. The Tribunal had held that the provision does not apply to bonus shares and HC affirmed that view; SC proceeded on that basis, addressing the legal issue without reinstating any different tax liability. The appeal was admitted for consideration after condonation of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 754 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781286</link>
      <description>SC condoned the delay and granted leave, allowing appeal on the question whether Section 56(2)(viia) applies to bonus shares. The Tribunal had held that the provision does not apply to bonus shares and HC affirmed that view; SC proceeded on that basis, addressing the legal issue without reinstating any different tax liability. The appeal was admitted for consideration after condonation of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>