https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464745 The HC refused bail in a case involving cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery and unlawful deposit-taking because the record disclosed a prima facie involvement of the accused and the investigation was still continuing. The Court found that the objection to re-registration of the same occurrence was untenable, as the matter had been transferred pursuant to judicial direction and the earlier registration was not treated as a fresh or successive FIR. It also considered the gravity of the allegations, the alleged cheating of depositors, and the real risk of tampering with evidence, and on that basis declined bail. en-us Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Nov 2025 19:42:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464745 The HC refused bail in a case involving cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery and unlawful deposit-taking because the record disclosed a prima facie involvement of the accused and the investigation was still continuing. The Court found that the objection to re-registration of the same occurrence was untenable, as the matter had been transferred pursuant to judicial direction and the earlier registration was not treated as a fresh or successive FIR. It also considered the gravity of the allegations, the alleged cheating of depositors, and the real risk of tampering with evidence, and on that basis declined bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464745