<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1659 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464756</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained where the reassessment return under section 148 was accepted without any addition and no clear finding was recorded that the assessee had concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars. In the absence of both an assessed addition and a categorical concealment finding, the factual foundation for penalty failed, so the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 19:42:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1659 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464756</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained where the reassessment return under section 148 was accepted without any addition and no clear finding was recorded that the assessee had concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars. In the absence of both an assessed addition and a categorical concealment finding, the factual foundation for penalty failed, so the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>