<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1481 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464736</link>
    <description>Bail in an alleged economic offence was declined because the investigation materials, including the FIR, witness statements and seized registers, showed a prima facie organised scheme of collecting deposits with promises of high returns. The HC treated the matter as a serious economic offence involving numerous depositors, substantial public loss and allegations of a deep-rooted conspiracy. It also considered that further investigation was still continuing. Applying the gravity of the offence, the public interest involved and the existing prima facie material, the Court held that the accused persons were not entitled to release at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 13:57:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1481 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464736</link>
      <description>Bail in an alleged economic offence was declined because the investigation materials, including the FIR, witness statements and seized registers, showed a prima facie organised scheme of collecting deposits with promises of high returns. The HC treated the matter as a serious economic offence involving numerous depositors, substantial public loss and allegations of a deep-rooted conspiracy. It also considered that further investigation was still continuing. Applying the gravity of the offence, the public interest involved and the existing prima facie material, the Court held that the accused persons were not entitled to release at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>