<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1547 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464744</link>
    <description>Madras HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s finding that Section 56(2)(viia) does not apply to bonus shares distributed to the assessee. The court found the issue settled by earlier Supreme Court and High Court decisions relied on by the Tribunal and held no fresh question of law arose warranting interference. Consequently, the Tribunal&#039;s order was affirmed and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 13:57:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1547 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464744</link>
      <description>Madras HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s finding that Section 56(2)(viia) does not apply to bonus shares distributed to the assessee. The court found the issue settled by earlier Supreme Court and High Court decisions relied on by the Tribunal and held no fresh question of law arose warranting interference. Consequently, the Tribunal&#039;s order was affirmed and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>