<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47882</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners in a case challenging the Assistant Collector of Central Excise&#039;s decision to reclassify vacuum brake hoses under a different chapter heading than the one determined by the Collector (Appeals). The Court emphasized the binding nature of appellate decisions on lower authorities unless there are changes in law or relevant facts. The Assistant Collector&#039;s reliance on new evidence and technical literature was deemed insufficient to override the Collector (Appeals)&#039;s decision. As a result, the Court quashed the Assistant Collector&#039;s order and upheld the petitioners&#039; challenge without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:19:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47882</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners in a case challenging the Assistant Collector of Central Excise&#039;s decision to reclassify vacuum brake hoses under a different chapter heading than the one determined by the Collector (Appeals). The Court emphasized the binding nature of appellate decisions on lower authorities unless there are changes in law or relevant facts. The Assistant Collector&#039;s reliance on new evidence and technical literature was deemed insufficient to override the Collector (Appeals)&#039;s decision. As a result, the Court quashed the Assistant Collector&#039;s order and upheld the petitioners&#039; challenge without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>