https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781121 HC held that the accused successfully rebutted the statutory presumption under Ss.118/139 N.I. Act on the preponderance of probabilities, so the complainant failed to prove s.138 offence. The court relied on contradictions in the complaint, the accused's account that a blank signed cheque was given as security, bank evidence as to the cheque's issuance date and subsequent dishonour memo, and absence of drawer confirmation for the date alteration. On this basis the appeal was dismissed. en-us Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:17:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781121 HC held that the accused successfully rebutted the statutory presumption under Ss.118/139 N.I. Act on the preponderance of probabilities, so the complainant failed to prove s.138 offence. The court relied on contradictions in the complaint, the accused's account that a blank signed cheque was given as security, bank evidence as to the cheque's issuance date and subsequent dishonour memo, and absence of drawer confirmation for the date alteration. On this basis the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781121