https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47879 Review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC read with Order 47 Rule 1 is confined to discovery of new material, error apparent on the face of the record, or other sufficient reason, and Section 152 CPC permits only correction of clerical, arithmetical, or accidental mistakes; it cannot be used to reappraise evidence or reopen the merits. On that basis, pre-suit interest was allowed, the repair/restoration amount for the car was corrected on the footing of accidental omission and unchallenged supporting evidence, and the interest computation and total decretal amount were revised to reflect the correct period. Other rejected claims, including loss on sale, did not obtain further relief. en-us Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:14:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47879 Review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC read with Order 47 Rule 1 is confined to discovery of new material, error apparent on the face of the record, or other sufficient reason, and Section 152 CPC permits only correction of clerical, arithmetical, or accidental mistakes; it cannot be used to reappraise evidence or reopen the merits. On that basis, pre-suit interest was allowed, the repair/restoration amount for the car was corrected on the footing of accidental omission and unchallenged supporting evidence, and the interest computation and total decretal amount were revised to reflect the correct period. Other rejected claims, including loss on sale, did not obtain further relief. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47879