<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 604 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781136</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court disposed of the special leave petition with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy within the stipulated time. The appellate authority was directed to decide the appeal on merits independently, without being influenced by the impugned findings or observations. The operative effect is that the petitioner retains access to the statutory appeal process, and the merits of that appeal must be considered afresh by the appellate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:17:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 604 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781136</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court disposed of the special leave petition with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy within the stipulated time. The appellate authority was directed to decide the appeal on merits independently, without being influenced by the impugned findings or observations. The operative effect is that the petitioner retains access to the statutory appeal process, and the merits of that appeal must be considered afresh by the appellate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>