<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 639 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781171</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of an addition under s.68, finding the assessee had discharged the onus to prove identity, creditworthiness of lenders and genuineness of unsecured loans. The AO did not point out defects or conduct further investigation, and the loans were repaid in the year and the subsequent year. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed and the addition by the AO was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 10:00:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 639 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781171</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of an addition under s.68, finding the assessee had discharged the onus to prove identity, creditworthiness of lenders and genuineness of unsecured loans. The AO did not point out defects or conduct further investigation, and the loans were repaid in the year and the subsequent year. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed and the addition by the AO was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>