<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 107 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47872</link>
    <description>The court held that the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) lacks jurisdiction to condone delays beyond 60 days in filing an appeal. The Limitation Act does not apply to proceedings under the Central Excise Act due to its self-contained nature. The High Court cannot condone delays under its writ jurisdiction if it would lead to inconsistent orders. As a result, the petition was dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:01:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 107 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47872</link>
      <description>The court held that the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) lacks jurisdiction to condone delays beyond 60 days in filing an appeal. The Limitation Act does not apply to proceedings under the Central Excise Act due to its self-contained nature. The High Court cannot condone delays under its writ jurisdiction if it would lead to inconsistent orders. As a result, the petition was dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>