https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47869 A prior adjudicatory direction cannot be separately revived or enforced once a subsequent High Court order has dealt with the same subject matter, because the earlier order merges into the later one. Here, the request to compel implementation of the Tribunal's earlier renewal direction failed since the High Court had later granted only liberty to apply for a temporary Customs House Agent licence without deciding the merits. The temporary licence application was also rejected on merits for non-fulfilment of regulatory conditions, and the affirming appellate order was left undisturbed. The challenge to revive the earlier direction was therefore not entertained. en-us Sat, 01 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:58:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47869 A prior adjudicatory direction cannot be separately revived or enforced once a subsequent High Court order has dealt with the same subject matter, because the earlier order merges into the later one. Here, the request to compel implementation of the Tribunal's earlier renewal direction failed since the High Court had later granted only liberty to apply for a temporary Customs House Agent licence without deciding the merits. The temporary licence application was also rejected on merits for non-fulfilment of regulatory conditions, and the affirming appellate order was left undisturbed. The challenge to revive the earlier direction was therefore not entertained. Case-Laws Customs Sat, 01 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47869