<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1547 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464718</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, upholding the SAT order of 16.02.2022 that imposed penalties under the Companies Act, 1956 concerning contention that the appellant served as key managerial personnel in two companies. The Court declined to interfere, noting the issue had been adjudicated in related appeals from the same investigation, and therefore affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to impose the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 19:01:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1547 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464718</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, upholding the SAT order of 16.02.2022 that imposed penalties under the Companies Act, 1956 concerning contention that the appellant served as key managerial personnel in two companies. The Court declined to interfere, noting the issue had been adjudicated in related appeals from the same investigation, and therefore affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to impose the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>