<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 178 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47867</link>
    <description>The power to insist on pre-deposit is mandatory in principle, but the appellate authority may waive it in full or part by exercising discretion on sound legal principles. That discretion must be based on a prima facie case, undue hardship, and the interest of revenue; it should not involve a detailed examination of the merits at that stage. Relevant material, including an existing Board circular and the assessee&#039;s prima facie credit position, must be considered, and arbitrary or irrational directions are vulnerable to interference. On the stated facts, the pre-deposit condition was unjustified and the appeal was directed to proceed on merits without deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:55:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 178 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47867</link>
      <description>The power to insist on pre-deposit is mandatory in principle, but the appellate authority may waive it in full or part by exercising discretion on sound legal principles. That discretion must be based on a prima facie case, undue hardship, and the interest of revenue; it should not involve a detailed examination of the merits at that stage. Relevant material, including an existing Board circular and the assessee&#039;s prima facie credit position, must be considered, and arbitrary or irrational directions are vulnerable to interference. On the stated facts, the pre-deposit condition was unjustified and the appeal was directed to proceed on merits without deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>