https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47862 Writ interference was not appropriate where the competent authority still had to determine eligibility for an exemption certificate and the affected company had an effective opportunity to respond. The proper course was for the company to answer the notice before the Director General, who could consider all objections, including jurisdictional points, and then decide the matter after hearing the company. On that basis, the challenge to cancellation could not be sustained at the writ stage, and the authority was required to pass a speaking order after considering the response. en-us Tue, 19 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:42:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47862 Writ interference was not appropriate where the competent authority still had to determine eligibility for an exemption certificate and the affected company had an effective opportunity to respond. The proper course was for the company to answer the notice before the Director General, who could consider all objections, including jurisdictional points, and then decide the matter after hearing the company. On that basis, the challenge to cancellation could not be sustained at the writ stage, and the authority was required to pass a speaking order after considering the response. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47862