https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464710 Pre-execution interference with a COFEPOSA preventive detention order is available only on narrow exceptional grounds, including where the order is shown to have been passed for a wrong purpose. The Court stated that it cannot reappraise the sufficiency of material or act as an appellate forum over subjective satisfaction. On the facts noted, the petitioner failed to show any wrong purpose. Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 requires a real part of the cause of action to arise within the Court's limits; mere residence was insufficient where search, seizure, investigation, and the alleged prejudicial activity occurred outside the State. The writ petition was held not maintainable. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Nov 2025 15:19:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464710 Pre-execution interference with a COFEPOSA preventive detention order is available only on narrow exceptional grounds, including where the order is shown to have been passed for a wrong purpose. The Court stated that it cannot reappraise the sufficiency of material or act as an appellate forum over subjective satisfaction. On the facts noted, the petitioner failed to show any wrong purpose. Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 requires a real part of the cause of action to arise within the Court's limits; mere residence was insufficient where search, seizure, investigation, and the alleged prejudicial activity occurred outside the State. The writ petition was held not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464710