https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464709 Preventive detention was found unsustainable where the detaining authority did not show genuine application of mind to a voluminous record, including material received immediately before the order, and gave no satisfactory explanation of when the material was examined. The absence of disclosure on receipt and scrutiny of the record supported the inference that subjective satisfaction was not properly formed. Detention was also impermissible because the detenu was already in judicial custody, had not sought bail, and there was no cogent material showing a real likelihood of release in the near future or any concrete basis for anticipating further prejudicial activity. The detention order was therefore quashed. en-us Fri, 12 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Nov 2025 15:06:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464709 Preventive detention was found unsustainable where the detaining authority did not show genuine application of mind to a voluminous record, including material received immediately before the order, and gave no satisfactory explanation of when the material was examined. The absence of disclosure on receipt and scrutiny of the record supported the inference that subjective satisfaction was not properly formed. Detention was also impermissible because the detenu was already in judicial custody, had not sought bail, and there was no cogent material showing a real likelihood of release in the near future or any concrete basis for anticipating further prejudicial activity. The detention order was therefore quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464709