https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464707 A private airport operator functioning under a statute-backed lease approved by the Central Government was treated as operating under that Government's authority for the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act and the Industrial Disputes Act, so the Central Government remained the appropriate government. The existing prohibition notification of 26 July 2004 against contract labour in trolley retrieval work applied to the airport establishment despite the change in private management, because section 10 operates at the level of the establishment and does not require a fresh notification after restructuring. The binding effect of the notification was upheld, and the workmen were granted monetary compensation in lieu of absorption or reinstatement. en-us Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Nov 2025 11:10:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464707 A private airport operator functioning under a statute-backed lease approved by the Central Government was treated as operating under that Government's authority for the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act and the Industrial Disputes Act, so the Central Government remained the appropriate government. The existing prohibition notification of 26 July 2004 against contract labour in trolley retrieval work applied to the airport establishment despite the change in private management, because section 10 operates at the level of the establishment and does not require a fresh notification after restructuring. The binding effect of the notification was upheld, and the workmen were granted monetary compensation in lieu of absorption or reinstatement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464707