<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>s.154 valid to correct record error and raise domestic company tax rate from 29% to 30% per Finance Act 2017</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94070</link>
    <description>ITAT affirmed that the AO validly invoked s.154 to correct an apparent error and increase the domestic company tax rate from 29% to 30% where the assessee was incorporated on 02.08.2016 and therefore had no turnover in PY 2014-15; Paragraph E( i ) of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 2017 (29% concessional rate) applies only to domestic companies existing in PY 2014-15 with turnover â‰¤ Rs.5 crore, whereas the assessee falls within clause (ii) prescribing 30%. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s conclusion and dismissed the assessee&#039;s grounds, rejecting the analogy to prior-year turnover and finding the s.143(3) figure of 29% to be an obvious record error corrected lawfully under s.154.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:20:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:20:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>s.154 valid to correct record error and raise domestic company tax rate from 29% to 30% per Finance Act 2017</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94070</link>
      <description>ITAT affirmed that the AO validly invoked s.154 to correct an apparent error and increase the domestic company tax rate from 29% to 30% where the assessee was incorporated on 02.08.2016 and therefore had no turnover in PY 2014-15; Paragraph E( i ) of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 2017 (29% concessional rate) applies only to domestic companies existing in PY 2014-15 with turnover â‰¤ Rs.5 crore, whereas the assessee falls within clause (ii) prescribing 30%. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s conclusion and dismissed the assessee&#039;s grounds, rejecting the analogy to prior-year turnover and finding the s.143(3) figure of 29% to be an obvious record error corrected lawfully under s.154.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:20:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>