<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellants ordered to refund 1,100 investors at 9% interest after land unusable from oil spillage and decades&#039; delay</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94059</link>
    <description>AT directed the appellants to refund monies to 1,100 investors who approached them, granting a reduced rate of interest of 9% per annum in lieu of the prayed 12%. The Tribunal found the land rendered unusable by oil spillage, preventing the cultivation of promised teak saplings and noting investors&#039; delay of approximately three decades. In the exercise of equitable discretion and in the interests of justice, the claim for refund was allowed subject to the reduced rate; appellants were ordered to make restitution to the identified investors at 9% p.a., thereby resolving the dispute without compelling performance of the original prospectus benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:20:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:20:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellants ordered to refund 1,100 investors at 9% interest after land unusable from oil spillage and decades&#039; delay</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94059</link>
      <description>AT directed the appellants to refund monies to 1,100 investors who approached them, granting a reduced rate of interest of 9% per annum in lieu of the prayed 12%. The Tribunal found the land rendered unusable by oil spillage, preventing the cultivation of promised teak saplings and noting investors&#039; delay of approximately three decades. In the exercise of equitable discretion and in the interests of justice, the claim for refund was allowed subject to the reduced rate; appellants were ordered to make restitution to the identified investors at 9% p.a., thereby resolving the dispute without compelling performance of the original prospectus benefits.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:20:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>