https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781062 NCLAT affirmed the NCLT's decision dismissing the challenge to contract termination and blacklisting, holding the termination arose from performance breaches, not the corporate debtor's insolvency, so the moratorium under S.14 IBC did not bar termination. Relying on SC precedent, the Tribunal held S.60(5) does not grant residual jurisdiction to adjudicate purely contractual disputes unconnected with CIRP, and the termination was not integral to the insolvency process. The appeal was found devoid of merit and dismissed. en-us Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:20:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781062 NCLAT affirmed the NCLT's decision dismissing the challenge to contract termination and blacklisting, holding the termination arose from performance breaches, not the corporate debtor's insolvency, so the moratorium under S.14 IBC did not bar termination. Relying on SC precedent, the Tribunal held S.60(5) does not grant residual jurisdiction to adjudicate purely contractual disputes unconnected with CIRP, and the termination was not integral to the insolvency process. The appeal was found devoid of merit and dismissed. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781062