<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 531 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781063</link>
    <description>NCLAT held the SRA&#039;s resolution plan validly approved (treated as having required votes after re-voting and application of the approved tie-breaker), set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s refusal to admit a relevant MCA email, and quashed findings that the SRA was ineligible under Section 29A. The Tribunal found no breach in acceptance of a third-party performance bank guarantee, no non-compliance with Regulation 38(3) as applicable, and that the net-worth eligibility was met. The impugned order of the Adjudicating Authority was declared unsustainable and was set aside; the appeal was disposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:20:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 531 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781063</link>
      <description>NCLAT held the SRA&#039;s resolution plan validly approved (treated as having required votes after re-voting and application of the approved tie-breaker), set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s refusal to admit a relevant MCA email, and quashed findings that the SRA was ineligible under Section 29A. The Tribunal found no breach in acceptance of a third-party performance bank guarantee, no non-compliance with Regulation 38(3) as applicable, and that the net-worth eligibility was met. The impugned order of the Adjudicating Authority was declared unsustainable and was set aside; the appeal was disposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>