<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 115 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47849</link>
    <description>The court held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act cannot be invoked to condone delays in filing reference applications under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act. The application for condonation of delay was rejected, emphasizing that the Central Excise Act is a special statute with its own limitation provisions. The court concurred with the view that the Act does not allow for the application of general provisions of the Limitation Act in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:13:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 115 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47849</link>
      <description>The court held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act cannot be invoked to condone delays in filing reference applications under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act. The application for condonation of delay was rejected, emphasizing that the Central Excise Act is a special statute with its own limitation provisions. The court concurred with the view that the Act does not allow for the application of general provisions of the Limitation Act in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>