https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781066 SAT refused condonation of a 1,059-day delay in filing an appeal. The tribunal found the appellant's explanations-being ousted from home, financial hardship, and ignorance of the impugned order-contradicted by the record and thus palpably false. While acknowledging procedural liberalism, the SAT held that false or incorrect pleadings cannot be permitted to salvage delay. The application to condone delay was held wholly unsatisfactory and was therefore rejected. en-us Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781066 SAT refused condonation of a 1,059-day delay in filing an appeal. The tribunal found the appellant's explanations-being ousted from home, financial hardship, and ignorance of the impugned order-contradicted by the record and thus palpably false. While acknowledging procedural liberalism, the SAT held that false or incorrect pleadings cannot be permitted to salvage delay. The application to condone delay was held wholly unsatisfactory and was therefore rejected. Case-Laws SEBI Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781066