<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 540 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781072</link>
    <description>CESTAT held a broker liable for penalty under s.112(b) of the Customs Act for facilitating post-import sale of cars that were misdeclared as to year and value, rendering them liable to confiscation under s.111(o). The tribunal found the broker must have known the true manufacture year and value and therefore participated in the transfer/sale. The appeals were disposed by confirming penalty liability but reducing the penalty in each order to Rs.25,000 under s.112(b).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:20:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 540 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781072</link>
      <description>CESTAT held a broker liable for penalty under s.112(b) of the Customs Act for facilitating post-import sale of cars that were misdeclared as to year and value, rendering them liable to confiscation under s.111(o). The tribunal found the broker must have known the true manufacture year and value and therefore participated in the transfer/sale. The appeals were disposed by confirming penalty liability but reducing the penalty in each order to Rs.25,000 under s.112(b).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>