<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 580 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781112</link>
    <description>HC set aside the portions of the impugned orders imposing and confirming a penalty of Rs.6,05,17,933/- as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Sections 74 and 75 of the KGST Act, and held the invocation of Section 122 to be improper. The petitioner&#039;s willingness to pay the tax and interest as determined was noted. The matter is remitted to the 2nd respondent for fresh reconsideration limited to the penalty payable, in accordance with law. Petition allowed in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:20:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 580 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781112</link>
      <description>HC set aside the portions of the impugned orders imposing and confirming a penalty of Rs.6,05,17,933/- as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Sections 74 and 75 of the KGST Act, and held the invocation of Section 122 to be improper. The petitioner&#039;s willingness to pay the tax and interest as determined was noted. The matter is remitted to the 2nd respondent for fresh reconsideration limited to the penalty payable, in accordance with law. Petition allowed in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>