<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 87 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47844</link>
    <description>Refund entitlement depending on disputed facts such as payment under protest, proper filing, finality of assessment, limitation, and passing on of duty may be remitted for fresh adjudication where the original records require verification. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to send the refund claims back to the Original Authority for de novo consideration because those factual issues could not be conclusively resolved at the appellate stage. It also held that no final view should be recorded on the applicability of the earlier Supreme Court ruling or on the protest procedure while the matter is being reconsidered afresh, since those questions must be examined on the evidence before the Original Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:49:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 87 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47844</link>
      <description>Refund entitlement depending on disputed facts such as payment under protest, proper filing, finality of assessment, limitation, and passing on of duty may be remitted for fresh adjudication where the original records require verification. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to send the refund claims back to the Original Authority for de novo consideration because those factual issues could not be conclusively resolved at the appellate stage. It also held that no final view should be recorded on the applicability of the earlier Supreme Court ruling or on the protest procedure while the matter is being reconsidered afresh, since those questions must be examined on the evidence before the Original Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>