<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 588 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781120</link>
    <description>SC issued notice returnable in six weeks and stayed operation of the impugned judgment and order dated 29-01-2025 pending disposal. The court held that a bar on duplicate or parallel proceedings could not be grounded on circulars that seek to override statutory provisions, characterizing reliance on such circulars as erroneous. The interim direction preserves the status quo while the legal validity of using circulars to preclude statutory remedies is adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:20:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 588 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781120</link>
      <description>SC issued notice returnable in six weeks and stayed operation of the impugned judgment and order dated 29-01-2025 pending disposal. The court held that a bar on duplicate or parallel proceedings could not be grounded on circulars that seek to override statutory provisions, characterizing reliance on such circulars as erroneous. The interim direction preserves the status quo while the legal validity of using circulars to preclude statutory remedies is adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>