<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1331 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464695</link>
    <description>ITAT (DELHI) upheld AO&#039;s finding that 50% of the land sale consideration was paid in cash and not recorded in books, based on the director&#039;s admission, but held that additions under s.69/153C must be limited to the unexplained cash payments actually established. The Tribunal directed deletion of any addition exceeding the cash amount so treated and observed CIT(A) failed to address this plea; ground raised by the assessee was accordingly partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 19:08:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1331 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464695</link>
      <description>ITAT (DELHI) upheld AO&#039;s finding that 50% of the land sale consideration was paid in cash and not recorded in books, based on the director&#039;s admission, but held that additions under s.69/153C must be limited to the unexplained cash payments actually established. The Tribunal directed deletion of any addition exceeding the cash amount so treated and observed CIT(A) failed to address this plea; ground raised by the assessee was accordingly partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>