<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1723 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464697</link>
    <description>ITAT (Pune) - AT: The Third Member, nominated after a split bench and reference to the President, held that the mandatory satisfaction under clause (b) of section 153C(1) was not recorded by the AO of the searched person for the two impugned assessment years; initiation of proceedings under s.153C was therefore unlawful and void ab initio. In view of the majority opinion, both appeals of the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 13:12:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1723 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464697</link>
      <description>ITAT (Pune) - AT: The Third Member, nominated after a split bench and reference to the President, held that the mandatory satisfaction under clause (b) of section 153C(1) was not recorded by the AO of the searched person for the two impugned assessment years; initiation of proceedings under s.153C was therefore unlawful and void ab initio. In view of the majority opinion, both appeals of the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>