https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47836 Where a statutory appellate remedy before CEGAT is available, the writ petition should not be pursued first and the petitioners were directed to file the appeal and any accompanying condonation application within three weeks. The Tribunal was asked to consider binding precedents from the Apex Court and this Court while hearing the appeal, stay request and any delay application, including the fact that the writ had remained pending since October 1999. The Court also preserved interim protection by keeping the undertaking in force until the Tribunal decided the stay application and by suspending implementation of any adverse stay order for a further three weeks. The substantive issues of precedent, delay and interim relief were thus left for the Tribunal. en-us Tue, 11 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:31:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47836 Where a statutory appellate remedy before CEGAT is available, the writ petition should not be pursued first and the petitioners were directed to file the appeal and any accompanying condonation application within three weeks. The Tribunal was asked to consider binding precedents from the Apex Court and this Court while hearing the appeal, stay request and any delay application, including the fact that the writ had remained pending since October 1999. The Court also preserved interim protection by keeping the undertaking in force until the Tribunal decided the stay application and by suspending implementation of any adverse stay order for a further three weeks. The substantive issues of precedent, delay and interim relief were thus left for the Tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 11 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47836