<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 843 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464676</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeals, set aside the convictions and sentences imposed by the Designated Court under Sections 399 and 402 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act, and acquitted the appellants. The Court found the alleged recoveries of knives unproved and therefore did not uphold the Arms Act convictions; it did not decide the jurisdictional contention. One appellant was ordered to be released forthwith if not detained in any other case; the other&#039;s bail bonds were cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 16:42:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 843 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464676</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeals, set aside the convictions and sentences imposed by the Designated Court under Sections 399 and 402 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act, and acquitted the appellants. The Court found the alleged recoveries of knives unproved and therefore did not uphold the Arms Act convictions; it did not decide the jurisdictional contention. One appellant was ordered to be released forthwith if not detained in any other case; the other&#039;s bail bonds were cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>