<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 106 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47832</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order, emphasizing procedural fairness, natural justice, and jurisdictional boundaries. It stressed the importance of conducting inquiries in line with legal principles and providing opportunities to all parties. Transparency, legality, and adherence to procedural norms in customs matters were highlighted for ensuring justice and fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:21:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 106 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47832</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order, emphasizing procedural fairness, natural justice, and jurisdictional boundaries. It stressed the importance of conducting inquiries in line with legal principles and providing opportunities to all parties. Transparency, legality, and adherence to procedural norms in customs matters were highlighted for ensuring justice and fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>