https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47829 The court found that the petitioner was unfairly treated by respondent No. 2 in not permitting provisional clearance of imported goods based on NIDB data, especially when other customs authorities allowed such clearance. The court ordered respondent No. 2 to release the goods on a provisional basis upon the petitioner furnishing a specified PD bond, accepting customs duty as per NIDB data. The court deemed respondent No. 2's actions as unjustified and directed the release of goods for provisional assessment without awarding any costs. en-us Wed, 03 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:12:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47829 The court found that the petitioner was unfairly treated by respondent No. 2 in not permitting provisional clearance of imported goods based on NIDB data, especially when other customs authorities allowed such clearance. The court ordered respondent No. 2 to release the goods on a provisional basis upon the petitioner furnishing a specified PD bond, accepting customs duty as per NIDB data. The court deemed respondent No. 2's actions as unjustified and directed the release of goods for provisional assessment without awarding any costs. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 03 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47829