<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 136 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47828</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the appellate order, and held that the petitioner could exclude the cost of packing material from the assessable value under the Central Excise Act. The decision emphasized the importance of contractual arrangements for returnability, as evidenced by the invoice clause, in determining the applicability of the exclusion clause.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:11:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 136 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47828</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the appellate order, and held that the petitioner could exclude the cost of packing material from the assessable value under the Central Excise Act. The decision emphasized the importance of contractual arrangements for returnability, as evidenced by the invoice clause, in determining the applicability of the exclusion clause.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>