<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47826</link>
    <description>Abatement of duty under the furnace-based special scheme could not be denied where the furnace remained closed and the assessee informed the department by telegram on a Sunday, then gave detailed intimation on the next working day. The High Court treated the notice as consistent with the statutory procedure and the department&#039;s own Trade Notice, holding that inability to make physical delivery during a holiday did not defeat compliance when prompt intimation was given. On that footing, the denial of abatement for the closure period was held unjustified and the reference petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:09:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47826</link>
      <description>Abatement of duty under the furnace-based special scheme could not be denied where the furnace remained closed and the assessee informed the department by telegram on a Sunday, then gave detailed intimation on the next working day. The High Court treated the notice as consistent with the statutory procedure and the department&#039;s own Trade Notice, holding that inability to make physical delivery during a holiday did not defeat compliance when prompt intimation was given. On that footing, the denial of abatement for the closure period was held unjustified and the reference petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>