<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 431 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD-LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780963</link>
    <description>Computer printouts and digital records used to quantify a clandestine removal demand were treated as inadmissible because the statutory conditions for computer output, including the required certificate establishing source and authenticity, were not met; signatures of panch witnesses and oral verification could not cure that defect. The remaining seized documents, statements, and surrounding circumstances, including diaries, gate passes, weighment slips, and transport material, were held insufficient by themselves to independently prove clandestine manufacture and clearance with the necessary certainty. The presumption arising from seizure did not overcome the evidentiary gap, and the demand and penalties therefore could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 12:17:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 431 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD-LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780963</link>
      <description>Computer printouts and digital records used to quantify a clandestine removal demand were treated as inadmissible because the statutory conditions for computer output, including the required certificate establishing source and authenticity, were not met; signatures of panch witnesses and oral verification could not cure that defect. The remaining seized documents, statements, and surrounding circumstances, including diaries, gate passes, weighment slips, and transport material, were held insufficient by themselves to independently prove clandestine manufacture and clearance with the necessary certainty. The presumption arising from seizure did not overcome the evidentiary gap, and the demand and penalties therefore could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>