<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 436 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780968</link>
    <description>CESTAT ND - AT held the second rectification application not maintainable and dismissed it, sustaining the department&#039;s objection. The Tribunal followed the Kerala HC view that once a rectification under s.254(2) IT Act has been considered and decided by the Tribunal, a subsequent rectification on the same issue by any party is impermissible; a second rectification is maintainable only for issues not previously decided in any rectification application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:56:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 436 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780968</link>
      <description>CESTAT ND - AT held the second rectification application not maintainable and dismissed it, sustaining the department&#039;s objection. The Tribunal followed the Kerala HC view that once a rectification under s.254(2) IT Act has been considered and decided by the Tribunal, a subsequent rectification on the same issue by any party is impermissible; a second rectification is maintainable only for issues not previously decided in any rectification application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>