<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 440 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780972</link>
    <description>The AT upheld that a prosecution complaint filed after 365 days remains maintainable because the SC&#039;s order excluding the period 15.03.2020-28.02.2022 from limitation must be given full effect; the tribunal distinguished precedents on default bail as relating to personal liberty and not continuation of property attachment. It accepted that COVID-19 impeded investigations and declined to narrowly construe the exclusion order. The interim protection against eviction and notices under the PMLA cannot continue after disposal of the appeal, though possession may be taken only for exceptional reasons as recognized by the SC. Application disposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:56:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 440 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780972</link>
      <description>The AT upheld that a prosecution complaint filed after 365 days remains maintainable because the SC&#039;s order excluding the period 15.03.2020-28.02.2022 from limitation must be given full effect; the tribunal distinguished precedents on default bail as relating to personal liberty and not continuation of property attachment. It accepted that COVID-19 impeded investigations and declined to narrowly construe the exclusion order. The interim protection against eviction and notices under the PMLA cannot continue after disposal of the appeal, though possession may be taken only for exceptional reasons as recognized by the SC. Application disposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>