https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780980 CESTAT held that appeals were dismissed where import licences/registrations were manipulated and TRAs were forged; the appellants' plea of ignorance was rejected because they failed to obtain TRAs from the port of registration or verify their authenticity, thus not exhibiting required due diligence. The issue was treated as covered by an earlier division bench decision, and invocation of the extended limitation period was not permitted. en-us Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Nov 2025 11:52:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780980 CESTAT held that appeals were dismissed where import licences/registrations were manipulated and TRAs were forged; the appellants' plea of ignorance was rejected because they failed to obtain TRAs from the port of registration or verify their authenticity, thus not exhibiting required due diligence. The issue was treated as covered by an earlier division bench decision, and invocation of the extended limitation period was not permitted. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780980