https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780981 ITAT HYDERABAD - AT set aside the CIT(A)'s impugned order and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication. The tribunal found the assessee had filed replies and supporting records with CIT(A), contradicting the appellate order's factual findings, and noted the original assessment was passed ex parte with income estimated on gross receipts due to an alleged failure to respond to a s.142(1) notice. The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:56:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780981 ITAT HYDERABAD - AT set aside the CIT(A)'s impugned order and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication. The tribunal found the assessee had filed replies and supporting records with CIT(A), contradicting the appellate order's factual findings, and noted the original assessment was passed ex parte with income estimated on gross receipts due to an alleged failure to respond to a s.142(1) notice. The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780981