<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 460 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780992</link>
    <description>ITAT CHANDIGARH affirmed CIT (Appeals)&#039;s deletion of a protective addition under s.2(22)(e), holding that receipts of Rs. 18.08 Cr from an associated company were contributions for a group project and constituted bona fide business transactions rather than deemed dividends. The tribunal noted payment of over Rs.1 crore interest and reliance on CBDT guidance and sub-clause (ii) of s.2(22)(e) to treat the receipts as non-dividend. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 16:06:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 460 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780992</link>
      <description>ITAT CHANDIGARH affirmed CIT (Appeals)&#039;s deletion of a protective addition under s.2(22)(e), holding that receipts of Rs. 18.08 Cr from an associated company were contributions for a group project and constituted bona fide business transactions rather than deemed dividends. The tribunal noted payment of over Rs.1 crore interest and reliance on CBDT guidance and sub-clause (ii) of s.2(22)(e) to treat the receipts as non-dividend. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>