https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781009 HC dismissed the writ petition as not entertained, holding the petitioner has an adequate alternative remedy under the Income Tax Act to challenge the assessment order. The court found the petitioner responded to the notice within the stipulated time and any prejudice or factual contention that the assessing officer exceeded the show-cause notice must be addressed on evidence before the appellate authority. The HC declined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appellate remedies to contest legality and factual issues in the assessment. en-us Thu, 06 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:56:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781009 HC dismissed the writ petition as not entertained, holding the petitioner has an adequate alternative remedy under the Income Tax Act to challenge the assessment order. The court found the petitioner responded to the notice within the stipulated time and any prejudice or factual contention that the assessing officer exceeded the show-cause notice must be addressed on evidence before the appellate authority. The HC declined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appellate remedies to contest legality and factual issues in the assessment. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 06 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781009