https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781017 The HC declined to interfere with the suspension of the petitioner, an Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, finding that allegations of negligence in failing to act on an adverse report and delay in issuing a show-cause notice are matters for departmental inquiry. The court refused to adjudicate the merits under Article 226, held it would not usurp the disciplinary authority, and disposed of the petition while directing the disciplinary authority to conclude the disciplinary proceedings within three months from presentation of the certified copy of the order. en-us Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:56:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781017 The HC declined to interfere with the suspension of the petitioner, an Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, finding that allegations of negligence in failing to act on an adverse report and delay in issuing a show-cause notice are matters for departmental inquiry. The court refused to adjudicate the merits under Article 226, held it would not usurp the disciplinary authority, and disposed of the petition while directing the disciplinary authority to conclude the disciplinary proceedings within three months from presentation of the certified copy of the order. Case-Laws GST Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781017