<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 487 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781019</link>
    <description>HC quashed the GST MOV-06 order and the impugned order dated 31.5.2023, finding no adequate inquiry to establish alleged reuse of documents or intent to evade tax. Authorities failed to verify movements and purchasing-dealer information before seizing goods intercepted en route from one city to another. Applying precedent, the court held seizure unjustified and set aside the orders; the writ petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:56:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 487 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781019</link>
      <description>HC quashed the GST MOV-06 order and the impugned order dated 31.5.2023, finding no adequate inquiry to establish alleged reuse of documents or intent to evade tax. Authorities failed to verify movements and purchasing-dealer information before seizing goods intercepted en route from one city to another. Applying precedent, the court held seizure unjustified and set aside the orders; the writ petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>