<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 496 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781028</link>
    <description>SC disposed the petition, holding that the earlier bench decision affirming the constitutional validity of Sections 69 and 70 of the GST enactments governs the matter. The Court confirmed the legislative competence to confer arrest powers under the Customs Act, 1962 and the Central GST Act, 2017, and recognized the scope for judicial review under Articles 32 and 226 in appropriate cases concerning reason to believe and non-cognizable offences. The petition was disposed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:56:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 496 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781028</link>
      <description>SC disposed the petition, holding that the earlier bench decision affirming the constitutional validity of Sections 69 and 70 of the GST enactments governs the matter. The Court confirmed the legislative competence to confer arrest powers under the Customs Act, 1962 and the Central GST Act, 2017, and recognized the scope for judicial review under Articles 32 and 226 in appropriate cases concerning reason to believe and non-cognizable offences. The petition was disposed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>