<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 497 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781029</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition, upholding the HC&#039;s refusal to intervene in proceedings challenging GST Department&#039;s seizure alleged to contravene Section 67 of the CGST Act, 2017. The HC found no grounds to disturb the impugned order, and SC agreed there was no reason to interfere, leaving the High Court&#039;s decision intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:56:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 497 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781029</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition, upholding the HC&#039;s refusal to intervene in proceedings challenging GST Department&#039;s seizure alleged to contravene Section 67 of the CGST Act, 2017. The HC found no grounds to disturb the impugned order, and SC agreed there was no reason to interfere, leaving the High Court&#039;s decision intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>